Our discussions in class about OERs made me think about the authors involved in publishing materials for distance education courses. Although it is a great asset to any educational community to have an open education resource, what is the incentive for the author to give the information for free?
When authors spend their own time and money researching, writing and publishing a text, they are invested in how that information is used -- Texts often cost upwards of $100 to purchase a hard copy -- by putting the text online, it saves paper, and usually is available to students at a discount -- thereby still offering the author a modicum of monetary compensation. But once it is available for free, for everyone, where is the author's incentive.
Although it doesn't yet seem to be a major issue, I find this to be moderately reminiscent of the Napster issues of the late 90s. Where do you draw the line as to offering free information for those who need it, and offering free information for anyone who wants it?